0112 Classification of reconstructed depth profiles shows Global and non-Global slow oscillations differentiate in the hippocampus and thalamus
Sleep(2022)
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Sleep slow oscillations (SOs, 0.5-1.5 Hz) can be classified on the scalp as Global, Local or Frontal, where Global SOs are found in most electrodes within a short time delay and gate long-range information flow during NREM sleep. In this study, we estimate the current density within the brain that generates a Global SO, to evaluate which sub-cortical structures are involved in Global SO dynamics. We then train multiple machine learning algorithms to distinguish between Global SOs and other SO types, and probe variance of Global/non-Global SO profiles within and across subjects.Sleep slow oscillations (SOs, 0.5-1.5 Hz) can be classified on the scalp as Global, Local or Frontal, where Global SOs are found in most electrodes within a short time delay and gate long-range information flow during NREM sleep. In this study, we estimate the current density within the brain that generates a Global SO, to evaluate which sub-cortical structures are involved in Global SO dynamics. We then train multiple machine learning algorithms to distinguish between Global SOs and other SO types, and probe variance of Global/non-Global SO profiles within and across subjects. Methods 32 volunteers (18 females) slept in the lab with polysomnography including 24 head EEG channels; their sleep was scored according to AASM criteria. SOs were algorithmically detected at each channel and classified as Global or non-Global using our method (Malerba et al., 2019). The depth profile of each SO was reconstructed with current source estimation (in Brainstorm followed by sLORETA), with a standardized head model including 17 regions. Each depth profile was embedded in a matrix averaging current by region and in three 200ms-long time bins: before, during and after the SO trough. Thirty classifiers were applied to this dataset, leveraging Matlab’s supervised learning application. We compared accuracy within and across subjects and identified best-performing algorithms across dataset size. We then used univariate feature selection to quantify the relevance of each region-time pair to successful classification. Results Global/non-Global SOs current depth profiles have higher variance across subjects, and accuracy improves when data is sampled between rather than within individuals. Ensemble subspace methods reached highest accuracy (98.5%). Feature selectivity identified cortical, hippocampal, and thalamic currents at the trough of the SO as the most relevant for Global/non-Global SO classifications. Conclusion We introduce an analytical framework enabling the study of SO depth profiles, including their time evolution, as matrices. The predominant differentiation of Global/non-Global SOs in cortical, hippocampal, and thalamic currents supports the potential functional difference of these SO types. Support (If Any) NIH grant (R01 AG046646) to S.C.M.
MoreTranslated text
Key words
Deep Learning for EEG
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
![](https://originalfileserver.aminer.cn/sys/aminer/pubs/mrt_preview.jpeg)
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined