Improving antenatal detection of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetus: economic evaluation of Growth Assessment Protocol

S. Relph,M. C. Vieira,A. Copas,K. Coxon, A. Alagna,A. Briley, M. Johnson,L. Page, D. Peebles,A. Shennan,B. Thilaganathan,N. Marlow,C. Lees,D. A. Lawlor,A. Khalil,J. Sandall,D. Pasupathy,A. Healey,Bolaji Coker,Maria Elstad,Walter Muruet‐Gutierrez,Natalie Moitt,Louisa Delaney,Lesley McCowan,Spyros Bakalis, Claire Rozette, Marcelo Canda,Simona Cicero, Olayinka Akinfenwa, Philippa Cox, Lisa Giacometti,Elisabeth Peregrine, Lyndsey Smith, Sam Page,Deepa Janga,Sandra Essien, Renata Hutt, Yaa Acheampong, Bonnie Trinder, Louise Rimell, Janet Cresswell, Sarah Petty,Bini Ajay,Hannah O'Donnell, Emma Wayman,Mandish Dhanjal,Muna Noori, Elisa Iaschi,Raffaele Napolitano, Iris Tsikimi, Rachel Das, Fiona Ghalustians, Francesca Hanks,Laura Camarasa, Hiran Samarage, Stephen Hiles,Anna David, David Howe,Nadine Seward,Elizabeth Allen,Jillian Francis

Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology（2022）

Cited 1|Views29

No score

Abstract

The economic case for replacing standard care with GAP is weak based on the analysis reported in our study. However, this conclusion should be viewed taking into account that cost-effectiveness analyses are always limited by the assumptions made. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Translated text

Key words

SGA,antenatal screening,cost-effectiveness,economic evaluation,growth assessment protocol

AI Read Science

Must-Reading Tree

Example

Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper

Chat Paper

Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined