Safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft in patients with STEMI and unprotected left main stem disease: A systematic review & meta-analysis

IJC Heart & Vasculature(2022)

引用 0|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
•The advent of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has caused much debate about the optimal revascularization method for LMCAD.•Several studies have previously been conducted comparing PCI versus CABG for LMCAD, however most of these have only taken into account randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while ignoring observational studies.•This study takes data from both RCTs and observational studies to obtain a better comparison of the two revascularization techniques.•It is the first meta-analysis to report data for various adverse outcomes after 10 years of follow-up.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Percutaneous coronary intervention,Coronary artery bypass graft,Unprotected left main coronary artery disease,Meta-analysis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要