Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study

Sabrina Piedimonte,Gregory R Pond,Marie Plante,Gregg Nelson,Janice Kwon,Alon Altman,Tomer Feigenberg,Laurie Elit,Susie Lau,Jeanelle Sabourin,Karla Willows,Christa Aubrey,Ji-Hyun Jang,Ly-Ann Teo-Fortin,Norah Cockburn,Nora-Beth Saunders,Sarah Shamiya,Limor Helpman,Danielle Vicus

Gynecologic Oncology（2022）

引用 5|浏览20

暂无评分

摘要

•There was no difference in RFS by surgical approach (MIS/open/CVLH) in patients with Stage IA1/IA2 cervical cancer.•This suggests that for microinvasive cervical cancer, MIS is safe and feasible.•Similar results were found in patients with Stage IAI LVSI+/IA2.•There were no differences in peri-operative complications between surgical groups.•Patients undergoing MIS had a shorter median length of stay but more ER visits.

查看译文

关键词

Cervical cancer,Minimally invasive surgery

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要