谷歌Chrome浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Information sharing preferences within buildings: Benefits of cognitive interviewing for enhancing a discrete choice experiment

Paul Haggar, Eleni Ampatzi, Dimitris Potoglou,Marcel Schweiker

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS(2022)

引用 3|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
To design and operate energy efficient and comfortable buildings it is important to know what the occu-pants' preferences for indoor environmental quality would be. These preferences are related to a range of personal characteristics that occupants may or may not be willing to share. Preparing materials for a forthcoming stated preference discrete choice experiment (SPDCE) aimed at investigating willingness of building occupants to share information, we conducted cognitive-interview pretesting with 12 partic-ipants to find out whether these materials were interpretable and meaningful. Qualitative analysis iden-tified seven important limitations, including misinterpretations and uncertainties arising from language and difficulties imagining the situation and options being described. Most participants expressed some desire for a deeper understanding and were not satisfied with the choices they were asked to make. We discuss how identifying these limitations assisted in refining these SPDCE materials, the potential cognitive interviewing has for enhancing the validity of study materials and the importance of better understanding when researching occupant behaviours. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Cognitive interviewing,Discrete choice experiment,Indoor environmental quality,Pretesting,Validity
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要