Third-generation cephalosporin resistant gram-negative bacteraemia in patients with haematological malignancy and rationale for surveillance- culture-guided empirical therapy; results from an 11-year multi-centre retrospective study

Jara R. de la Court,Sjoukje H. S. Woudt,Annelot F. Schoffelen,Jarom Heijmans,Nick A. de Jonge, Tjomme van der Bruggen,Marije K. Bomers,Merel M. C. Lambregts, Rogier P. Schade, Kim C.E. Sigaloff

semanticscholar(2022)

引用 0|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Objectives Among patients with haematological malignancy, bacteraemia is a common complication during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Resistance of gram-negative pathogens to third-generation cephalosporins is increasing. We aimed to provide rationale for surveillance-culture-guided (SCG) empirical therapy for this population. Methods Using 11 years of data (2008–2018) from the Dutch national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system, we assessed the prevalence of third-generation cephalosporin resistant Gram-negative bacteria (3GCR-GNB) in episodes of bacteraemia, and the proportion of 3GCR-GNB bacteraemia that was preceded by 3GCR-GNB colonization (identified using surveillance cultures) in the year before. Results We included 3,887 patients, representing 4,142 episodes of bacteraemia. GNB were identified in 715/4,142 (17.3%), of which 221 (30.9%) were 3GCR-GNB. In (106/139) 76.2% of patients with a 3GCR-GNB bacteraemia and available GNB surveillance cultures in the preceding year, 3GCR-GNB colonization had been previously identified. Conclusions This multi-centre study shows that in patients with haematological malignancy, the majority of 3GCR-GNB bacteraemia is preceded by 3GCR-GNB colonization. To restrict empirical carbapenem use, surveillance-culture-guided empirical therapy is a viable strategy, against the background of high 3GCR rates.
更多
查看译文
关键词
haematological malignancy,third-generation,gram-negative,culture-guided,multi-centre
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要