TKB48 at TREC 2021 Fairness Ranking Track.

Zhuoqi Jin,Hideo Joho, Sumio Fujita

TREC(2021)

引用 0|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Fairness ranking has been recently focused on, which aims to make ranking results fair while keeping relevant. The definition of fairness is diverse. TREC Fairness Ranking Track in 2021 took attentionweighted rank fairness (AWRF) [12] to fit the fairness aspect distribution of ranking results to a population estimator p̂ reflecting the target distribution. TKB48’s approach was a post-processing method. We obtained an initial ranking using the BM25 score. We then set a bucket for each of 7 geographic areas in the dataset, and iterated the initial BM25 ranking to choose documents and put them into the bucket in a round-robin manner. As the track evaluated the top 20 results of the final ranking, the goal for us was to make the distribution of each area be the same as the target distribution in the top 20 results. We defined the individual fairness score so that we could choose whether a document should be put into the bucket by comparing an individual fairness score and BM25 score. The individual fairness score was based on how many documents in a certain area has been put into the final ranking. We chose one document with the highest combined score of fairness and relevance for one iterate turn of initial ranking. And we iterated 1000 times so that we could get a final ranking with 1000 documents. Our results ranked fifth out of 13 submissions on the TREC Fairness Ranking Track. Finally, we compared the results of different methods on the TREC Fairness Ranking Track and analyzed it.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要