Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Assessing the Quality and Performance of Institutional Review Boards: Impact of the Revised Common Rule

Min-Fu Tsan, Hannah Van Hook

JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS(2022)

Cited 1|Views2
No score
Abstract
The Common Rule, revised extensively to enhance human subjects protections and to reduce burdens to investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs), was implemented on January 19, 2019. We analyzed IRB performance metric data from 2016 through 2021 to evaluate the potential impact of the revised Common Rule on the quality and performance of IRBs. From 2016 to 2021, exempt protocols increased by 159% and protocols requiring IRB continuing reviews decreased by 28%. As only 48% of all protocols in 2021 were subjected to the revised Common Rule requirements, numbers of exempt protocols and protocols requiring IRB continuing reviews will continue to increase and decrease, respectively, in the next few years. Among a total of 16 IRB performance metrics studied, 4 improved, 4 deteriorated, and 8 remained unchanged from 2016 through 2021. This study represents the first effort to evaluate the impact of revised Common rule on IRB quality and performance.
More
Translated text
Key words
common rule, continuing review, exempt protocol, institutional review board, institutional review board quality and performance, revised common rule
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined