Different fat sources in supplements for beef cattle at pasture

We investigated the consequences of fat supplementation (free oil and rumen-protected oil) on the nutrient intake and digestion of beef cattle at pasture. Five rumen-cannulated Nelore bulls, with a median body weight (BW) of 467.8 ± 32.8 kg and an age of 26 months, were distributed in a Latin square design (5 × 5). The treatments were as follows: WF, no additional fat; PA, rumen-protected palm oil; PS, rumen-protected soybean oil; SO, soybean-free oil and CO, free corn oil. Nutrient intake and digestibility, ruminal pH and ammonia (NH 3 -N), serum urea and nitrogen balance were analysed. The supplements with different oil sources did not alter ( P > 0.05) the intake and digestibility of dry matter (DM), forage DM intake (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), neutral detergent fibre-corrected ash and protein (apNDF), nonfibre carbohydrates (NFC) or total digestible nutrients (TDN) compared to WF. An increase ( P < 0.05) in the intake and digestibility of EE was observed with the inclusion of fat, independent of the source. No differences were observed between WF and other supplements with regard to ruminal parameters (pH and NH 3 -N) ( P > 0.05) and serum urea ( P > 0.05). The nitrogen balance was not affected by the fat source ( P > 0.05). Supplementation of grazing beef cattle (2 g/kg BW) with free oil (130 g/kg DM supplement) or rumen-protected oil (160 g/kg DM supplement) did not interfere with nutrient intake and digestibility.