A Comparison of CT-Guided Bone Biopsy and Fluoroscopic-Guided Disc Aspiration as Diagnostic Methods in the Management of Spondylodiscitis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Percutaneous tissue biopsy is a key step in the diagnosis and management of spondylodiscitis, often utilizing CT-guided bone biopsy or fluoroscopic-guided disc aspirations. Our objective was to compare radiation exposure, procedure time, sedation requirement & yield between the two modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS:103 patients in 2 cohorts underwent fluoroscopic-guided disc aspirations (n = 47) or CTguided bone biopsy (n = 46) for diagnosis of spondylodiscitis. Patient and imaging data were gathered to ensure matched cohorts. Interventional and post-procedural data included radiation exposure, procedure time, complications, and microbiological details. Yield was calculated using MRI findings as the gold standard for infection. RESULTS:There were no significant differences between cohorts in demographics, symptom duration, or pre-procedure antibiotics use. CT-guided bone biopsy required more general anesthesia (26% vs 0%, P < 0.001), had longer radiation exposure time (60 ± 24s vs 2 ± 3s, P < 0.001), radiation dose (114.4 ± 71.6 mGy vs 70.4 ± 147.2 mGy), and procedure time (62 ± 14m vs 31 ± 23m, P < 0.001) than fluoroscopic-guided disc aspirations. There was no significant difference in yield (34% vs 32%, P = 0.661), and it was not affected by antibiotic use. CONCLUSIONS:Both modalities have similar utility in isolating causative organisms in suspected cases of spondylodiscitis. Our results suggest that increased radiation exposure, longer procedure time, and increased anesthesia use are relative disadvantages of CT-guided biopsy without an increase in yield. Controlled trials may be beneficial in determining the optimal choice in different scenarios.