Effects of flexible scheduling and virtual visits on burnout for clinicians: 1- year follow-up

Objective: Burnout is a healthcare quality problem, linked to negative impacts in patient care and healthcare providers. The pandemic prompted clinicians to adapt virtual practices and adopt more flexible, autonomous schedules. However, the impact of flexible scheduling and autonomy on provider burnout is unknown. The study aim was to evaluate the effect of flexible schedules versus standard schedules, and the amount of digital care, on burnout. Methods: This was a prospective survey study at two time points 6 months apart. Providers from Rheumatology, Neurology, and Pediatrics completed surveys at baseline, between 6/22/2020-9/8/2020, and six months later, between 12/20/20-3/12/21. The primary outcome was the Mini-Z work life survey which measured burnout in 2 different groups: flexible schedules (FS) and standard schedules (SS) during the height of the pandemic. Results: The study included 149 providers, 47 with FS and 102 with SS, who completed the survey at baseline and 6 months later. At baseline providers reported high job satisfaction (85.9%) and low burnout (29.7%), which remained consistent at 6 months. Compared to those with SS, clinicians with FS participated in a greater number of telemedicine activities at baseline, but did not differ significantly in degree of burnout (25.5% FS, 31.7% SS, p=0.45). Participants in the FS group were significantly more likely to indicate improvement in control over workload and experience reduced work-related stress compared to those in the SS group. There was no association between amount of telemedicine visits and burnout. Predictors of burnout at 6 months included Rheumatology providers and those in the 20-39 year old age group. Discussion: Schedule flexibility does not appear to influence overall burnout; however it does impact variables associated with burnout such as control over workload and perceived job stress. Conclusions: Participants reported overall job satisfaction, and FS did not impact overall burnout. FS was more likely to indicate improvement in control over workload and experienced reduced work-related stress compared to SS. In addition, burnout was more likely in the 20-39 year old age group, suggesting that special focus should be paid to this age group.