Effect of pulping methods on the physicochemical properties of the Kenyan red and white‐fleshed guava pulp

JSFA reports(2022)

Cited 0|Views2
No score
Abstract
Background Although fruit pulping is a highly effective global practice for ensuring a steady supply of fruit for processing during the off‐season, industrial pulping of Kenyan guava cultivars is lacking, contributing to their annual losses. The present study compared the yield characteristics, physicochemical profile, and nutrient retention of pulp extracted from white and red‐fleshed Kenyan guavas using cold and hot extraction methods. Results The pulp yield was highest in the red guava with the pulp to by‐product ratio being significantly ( p < 0.05) higher at 2.58, 2.97, and 3.30 for cold, hot water, and steam‐blanched compared to 1.66, 1.95, and 2.03 for the white guava respectively. Although hot extraction methods resulted in significantly ( p < 0.0001) higher yields (67%–77%) compared to the cold (62%–73%), the heat‐labile nutrients were affected with as much as 60% and 64% of the white and the red guava's vitamin C being lost. The steam blanched pulps exhibited significantly ( p < 0.0001) high overall color changes (∆E) ranging from 22–30 in the pasteurized white guava pulp compared to the red's (−0.24–6). The cold extraction method resulted in better retention of β‐carotene (1.9 ± 0.4 mg), zinc (5.6 ± 2.1 mg), iron (20.1 ± 8.6 mg), flavonoids (241.3 ± 56mgCE), phenolics (1548.7 ± 25.8mgGAE) and antioxidant activities (1998.6 ± 333μMTE) per 100 g in the red guava pulp. Conclusion Compared to the white cold‐extracted pulp, the red guava pulp was more suitable for further processing due to its high nutrient retention, high pulp to by‐products ratio, and textural properties therefore recommended for the adoption of processing the Kenyan guava cultivars.
More
Translated text
Key words
physicochemical properties,kenyan red
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined