Sp0136 how to perform us-guided interventions + demo

Background: Aspiration and injection of joints and soft tissues is an indispensable skill used in everyday practice by the clinical rheumatologist. These tasks are usually conducted by palpation-guided techniques. These procedures are not always successful (1) and thus US -guided interventions have been developed. Objectives: are to explain the effect of needle and sound beam angle on needle visualization, describe different techniques of needle insertion under US guidance, to identify different approaches to the target under US guidance and finally to discuss about the accuracy and efficacy of the ultrasound guided technique. Methods: There are two common methods for US puncturing: semi-guided or indirect method (skin surface marking) and needle guidance under direct sonographic vision (2,3). The scanning plane is optimized for visualization of the target and penetration of the needle should be at least 0.5cm from the transducer. The movement of the needle in the soft tissue should be followed on the screen during the procedure. The needle appears as a bright echoic line if the transducer is oriented longitudinally on the needle, and the needle tip may be followed as it reaches the target. If the ultrasound beam is transverse to the needle, the needle is seen as a bright echoic dot. In case of no visualization of the needle several means are available: steering of the ultrasound beam against the needle (in new machines), curved or virtual convex probe, toeing -in of the probe, shaken the needle slightly and moving the probe a bit from side to side. Results: According to the clinical and cadaveric studies the ultrasound guided technique is more accurate than the landmark guided technique in the glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, wrist, hand, hip, knee and foot joints and in the tendons of the biceps, wrist, hand hip, knee and ankle (4). Synovial biopsies are more accurate using an ultrasound guided method (5). Conclusion: Ultrasound is the most applicable and feasible imaging modality for routine clinical use in guiding musculoskeletal procedures. Though many studies have examined the role of imaging guidance for injection there needs to be more examination of how the use of ultrasound prior to injection can alter the pathological and anatomical diagnosis. There is a trend towards an expanded number of advanced applications of interventional musculoskeletal ultrasound which can also be performed by a rheumatologist like nerve blocks or needling of calcifications. Which ultrasound guided technique (direct or semi-guided) is the most appropriate in different anatomical areas and clinical settings remains to be studied. More studies are needed to show the accuracy and efficacy of ultrasound guided injections in different anatomical areas (4). References: [1] Jones A, et al. Importance of placement of intra-articular steroid injections. BMJ 1993;307:1329-1330. [2] Koski JM. Ultrasound guided injections in rheumatology. J Rheumatol 2000;7:2131-8. [3] Fessell DP, et al. Using sonography to reveal and aspirate joint effusions. AJR 2000;174:1353-62. [4] Kane D, Koski JM. Musculoskeletal interventional procedures: With or without imaging guidance? In Clinical Rheumatology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2016:736-750. [5] Kelly S, et al. Ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy: a safe, well-tolerated and reliable technique for obtaining high-quality synovial tissue from both large and small joints in early arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:611-617. Disclosure of Interests: None declared