Patient access in fourteen high-income countries to new antibacterials approved by the FDA, EMA, PMDA, or Health Canada, 2010-2020.

Clinical Infectious Diseases(2021)

引用 12|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
Background Inaccessibility of medicines in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is a frequent challenge. Yet it is typically assumed that high-income countries have complete access to the full arsenal of medicines. This study tests this assumption for new antibacterials, which are saved as a last resort in order to prevent the development of resistance, resulting in insufficient revenues to offset costs. Prior studies report only regulatory approval, missing the important lag that occurs between approval and commercial launch, although some antibiotics never launch in some countries. Methods We identified all antibacterials approved and launched in the G7 and seven other high-income countries in Europe for the decade beginning January 1, 2010, using quantitative methods to explore associations. Results Eighteen new antibacterials were identified. The majority were accessible in only three countries (US, UK, and Sweden), with the remaining eleven high-income countries having access to less than half of them. European marketing authorization did not lead to automatic European access, as fourteen of the antibacterials were approved by EMA, but many fewer were commercially launched. There was no significant difference in access between innovative and non-innovative antibacterials. Median annual sales in the first launched market (generally the US) for these 18 antibiotics were low, $16.2M. Conclusions Patient access to new antibacterials is limited in some high-income countries including Canada, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. With low expected sales, companies may have decided to delay or forego commercialization due to expectations of insufficient profitability.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要