The role of perilesional and multiparametric resonance imaging-targeted biopsies to reduce the risk of upgrading at radical prostatectomy pathology: A retrospective monocentric study

Purpose To evaluate histopathologic upgrading between biopsy methods and whole-mount prostatectomy specimens in International Society of Urological Pathology grade group. Methods Overall, 134 patients, including 175 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-suspicious lesions, diagnosed on MRI-targeted (TB) and systematic (SB) biopsies before radical prostatectomy were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Perilesional (PLB) and “extended” perilesional (ePLB) biopsies were defined as those taken within a circumferential zone of 5 and 10 mm around magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-suspicious lesion respectively. Proportion of upgrading at prostatectomy pathology were compared between TB, TB + PLB, TP + ePLB and TB + SB. Uni- and multivariable logistic regressions assessed predictors of upgrading for TB + ePLB method. Results Focusing on index lesion, median (interquartile range) number of cores taken was 4 (3–4) for TB, 5 (4–6) for TB + PLB, 6 (5–8) for TB + ePLB and 12 (12–15) for TB + SB. A higher upgrading proportion was detected upon comparing TB and TB + PLB methods to TB + SB (32 vs. 19%, P = 0.001, 26 vs. 19%, P = 0.04, respectively). Conversely, no significant difference was found between TB + ePLB compared to TB + SB (23 vs. 19%, P = 0.2). Proportion of downgrading was similar regardless of biopsy method (all P > 0.1). At multivariable analysis, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering score, total number of positive ePLB cores and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group were independent predictors of upgrading (all P ≤ 0.03). Similar results were found by adding data from non-index lesions. Conclusion Our finding suggest that MRI-targeted biopsies associated with perilesional sampling in a circumferential zone of 10 mm reduced upgrading proportion and showed similar accuracy as the current gold standard combination. Further prospective studies comparing biopsy methods are expected to validate this diagnostic strategy.