Collaboration, Compromise, and Conflict: How to Form Partnerships in Environmental Assessment and Monitoring

Thomas P. Simon,Robert M. Goldstein, Patricia A. Bailey, Eric Pearson,Michael Ell, Konrad Schmidt, John Emblom, Lynn Schlueter

Assessing the Sustainability and Biological Integrity of Water Resources Using Fish Communities(2020)

引用 0|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Partnerships between agencies and academicians to develop solutions for environmental problems have faced substantial difficulties. Often, the relationship is based on specific research questions supported by grants. Federal agencies responsible for environmental monitoring often form partnerships with state and local agencies to accomplish large-scale projects. However, collaboration among agencies with differing objectives often leads to conflict. Differences in missions or legislative mandates among agencies are often the basis for the inability to collaborate on mutually beneficial projects. The development of regionally based biological expectations or “biocriteria” is an important stepping stone in reaching a consensus and consolidating objectives among agencies. This approach could bridge conflicting monitoring strategies and objectives and provide common ground for assessment and interpretation of the biological data among local, state, and federal agencies. Frequent conversation and open dialogue, including both telephone and face-to-face meetings, will build partnerships and establish trust among cooperators.
更多
查看译文
关键词
environmental assessment,partnerships,collaboration,conflict,monitoring
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要