Addressing Anti-Fat Bias in Psychology: Education and Resistance

Women's Reproductive Health(2019)

引用 4|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
This is a commentary on Ward and McPhail’s (2019 Ward, P., & McPhail, D. (2019). Fat shame and blame in reproductive care: Implications for ethical health care interactions. Women’s Reproductive Health, 6, 225–241. doi:10.1080/23293691.2019.1653581[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar]) article “Fat Shame and Blame in Reproductive Care: Implications for Ethical Health Care Interactions.” Here I note the importance of good mental health to positive pregnancy and childbirth experiences and consider whether psychologists and other mental health professionals share medical providers’ tendencies to blame and shame their fat clients (they do). I discuss the absence of coverage of sizeism (fat prejudice) in textbooks used to train psychology graduate students, students’ and trainees’ resistance to discussions of sizeism in classes and workshops, and the importance of intersectionality and consideration of fat as a social identity. Resources for teaching and practicing fat-affirmative psychotherapy are provided.
更多
查看译文
关键词
psychology,bias,education,anti-fat
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要