Alien or Native? How to Distinguish Feces of Fallow and Roe Deer Using Central Poland as a Case Study

Simple Summary Fallow and roe deer are both game species, and therefore it is crucial to monitor their population locally and on a country scale. The method of pellet group count is commonly used for estimating population trends of ungulates; however, in the case of the two species, the misidentification rate can be high due to their similar body size. Our aim was to determine a metrical threshold between pellet groups of roe deer (native species) and fallow deer (alien species) to be applied during fieldwork. We measured the number of feces in the group, the length and width of five randomly selected feces from each pellet group and the length/width ratio. Roe deer pellets were shorter, narrower and less elongated than those of fallow deer; yet, length was found to be the best discriminant. The most accurate threshold was 1.2 cm. The mean number of pellets in a group was lower for roe deer than for fallow deer. A value of 50-52 pellets best differentiated between the two species. We therefore concluded that, on the basis of morphometric measurement, it is possible to distinguish roe and fallow deer feces. The method of pellet group count is commonly used for estimating population trends of ungulates; however, in the case of species of similar body size, the misidentification rate can be high. Our aim was to find a metrical threshold between pellet groups of roe deer (native species) and fallow deer (alien species) to be applied during fieldwork. The study was conducted in spring 2020 and 2021 in central Poland (lowlands) in areas were only roe or fallow deer occurred. We measured the number of feces in the group, the length and width of five randomly selected feces from each pellet group and the length/width ratio. Roe deer pellets were shorter, narrower and less elongated than those of fallow deer; yet, length was found to be the best discriminant. The most accurate threshold was 1.2 cm, i.e., 12-15% of pellets were over/below this value. The mean number of pellets in a group was lower for roe deer (39.6, SE = 1.6) than for fallow deer (64.5, SE = 1.5). A value of 50-52 pellets best differentiated between the two species. To conclude, combining these two measurements could be an objective method to distinguish between pellet groups of the two species.