National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Adverse Events Combined With Clavien-Dindo Scores Can Direct Quality Improvement Processes in Surgical Patients

Objective The burden of postoperative adverse events (AE) weighs immediately on the patient as unanticipated stress and on the healthcare system as unreimbursed cost. Applying the Clavien-Dindo (C-D) system of AE gradation as a surrogate of cost, we analyzed 4 years' data from a single-state National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) collaboration, hypothesizing that trends of AE were consistent over time and that more frequently performed cases would be associated with less and more minor AE. Methods The NSQIP defined AEs, consisting of 21 listed postoperative occurrences, which were analyzed using deidentified 30-day postoperative data for 2015 to 2018. Each AE was graded using (C-D) severity (1, lowest; 4, highest with survival). The C-D severity weight, as defined in previous multi-institutional studies, was used as a surrogate for cost and unplanned patient burden. Adverse event incidence was calculated as sum AE/case volume, and population burden as total AE burden/case volume. Results There were 12,567 surgical cases recorded by members of the state collaborative. The overall data demonstrated no significant difference in AE incidence; however, the burden of AE increased by 18.8%. The 8 most common Current Procedural Terminology codes had approximately 50% lower AE incidence compared with overall cases; however, the incidence increased by 56.0% and the AE burden/case increased by 48.0%. Conclusions Although the 8 most common Current Procedural Terminology codes showed a 50% lower AE incidence compared with overall cases, the incidence increased over the study period. Surgical quality initiatives should be patient centered and focus on high burden AE.