DF-SSmVEP: Dual Frequency Aggregated Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential Design with Bifold Canonical Correlation Analysis

Recent advancements in Electroencephalographic (EEG) sensor technologies and signal processing algorithms have paved the way for further evolution of Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) in several practical applications, ranging from rehabilitation systems to smart consumer technologies. When it comes to Signal Processing (SP) for BCI, there has been a surge of interest on Steady-State motion Visual Evoked Potentials (SSmVEP), where motion stimulation is used to address key issues associated with conventional light flashing/flickering. Such benefits, however, come with the price of being less accurate and having a lower Information Transfer Rate (ITR). From this perspective, this paper focuses on the design of a novel SSmVEP paradigm without using resources such as trial time, phase, and/or number of targets to enhance the ITR. The proposed design is based on the intuitively pleasing idea of integrating more than one motion within a single SSmVEP target stimuli, simultaneously. To elicit SSmVEP, we designed a novel and innovative dual frequency aggregated modulation paradigm, called the Dual Frequency Aggregated Steady-State motion Visual Evoked Potential (DF-SSmVEP), by concurrently integrating "Radial Zoom" and "Rotation" motions in a single target without increasing the trial length. Compared to conventional SSmVEPs, the proposed DF-SSmVEP framework consists of two motion modes integrated and shown simultaneously each modulated by a specific target frequency. The paper also develops a specific unsupervised classification model, referred to as the Bifold Canonical Correlation Analysis (BCCA), based on two motion frequencies per target. The corresponding covariance coefficients are used as extra features improving the classification accuracy. The proposed DF-SSmVEP is evaluated based on a real EEG dataset and the results corroborate its superiority. The proposed DF-SSmVEP outperforms its counterparts and achieved an average ITR of 30.7 +/- 1.97 and an average accuracy of 92.5 +/- 2.04, while the Radial Zoom and Rotation result in average ITRs of 18.35 +/- 1 and 20.52 +/- 2.5, and average accuracies of 68.12 +/- 3.5 and 77.5 +/- 3.5, respectively.