Proportion versus absolute counts of B cell populations in the assessment of immunological profiles of kidney transplant recipients

Immunophenotyping lymphocytes in kidney transplant recipients often raises questions as to whether pro-portions or absolute counts should be considered, especially for longitudinal assessment. Several studies conclude the pathophysiology of rejection based on proportions of naive and memory B cells. We compared the two analytical methods for B cells sampled from 82 clinically stable, adult kidney transplant recipients. Time post-transplant was analyzed both as a continuous variable and as tertiles ( 1.5 years, 1.5-8 years, and 8 years). B cells were stained for CD38 and IgD and were classified according to mature B cells (Bm) classification. The proportion of cells in the naive Bm2 compartment decreased by more than half in the late versus the early tertile, whereas the percentages of memory early Bm5 tripled and that of memory Bm5 cells doubled. In contrast, we observed a substantial reduction in naive B cell counts, but very stable memory B cell counts. Linear re-gressions showed that the absolute reduction in the Bm2 cell compartment was independent of age, sex, graft function, immunosuppression scheme, and rejection occurrence. In conclusion, the physiological reservoir of naive cells decreases over time post-transplant in kidney recipients, whereas that of memory B cells remains stable. Peripheral B subset percentages should be interpreted cautiously when analyzing pathophysiological processes.