Title : The Reliability of Eyewitness Identifications from Police Lineups Abbreviated Title : Eyewitness Identifications from Police Lineups Author names and affiliations :

Laboratory-based mock-crime studies have often been interpreted to mean that (a) eyewitness confidence in an identification made from a lineup is a weak indicator of accuracy and (b) sequential lineups are diagnostically superior to traditional simultaneous lineups. Largely as a result, juries are increasingly encouraged to disregard eyewitness confidence, and up to 30% of law enforcement agencies in the U.S. have adopted the sequential procedure. We conducted a field study of actual eyewitnesses who were assigned to simultaneous or sequential photo lineups in the Houston Police Department over a one-year period. Identifications were made using a 3point confidence scale, and a signal-detection model was used to analyze and interpret the results. Our findings suggest that (a) confidence in an eyewitness identification from a fair lineup is a highly reliable indicator of accuracy and (b) if there is any difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two lineup formats, it likely favors the simultaneous procedure. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In contrast to prior research, recent studies of simulated crimes have reported that (a) eyewitness confidence can be a strong indicator of accuracy and (b) traditional simultaneous lineups may be diagnostically superior to sequential lineups. The significance of our study is that these issues were investigated using actual eyewitnesses to a crime. Recent laboratory trends were confirmed: eyewitness confidence was strongly related to accuracy, and simultaneous lineups were, if anything, diagnostically superior to sequential lineups. These results suggest that recent reforms in the legal system, which were based on the results of older research, may need to be