Comparison of marsupialization under nasal endoscopy versus Lacrimal probing for treatment of congenital dacryocystoceles: a report of 40 cases

Abstract Introduction This study was performed to compare the efficacy of marsupialization under nasal endoscopy versus Lacrimal probing in the treatment of congenital dacryocystocele. Methods Forty neonates (43 eyes) diagnosed with congenital dacryocystoceles were divided into Group A (nasal endoscopic marsupialization) and Group B (Lacrimal probing). The patients were followed up for 1 year after surgery. The efficacy, incidence of complications, and reoperation rate were compared between the two groups. Results The male:female ratio was 25:15 patients (27:16 eyes). In Group A, the success rate was 100%, the incidence of complications was 5%, and the reoperation rate was 0%. In Group B, the success rate was 90%, the incidence of complications was 20%, and the reoperation rate was 30%. Conclusion Compared with Lacrimal probing, marsupialization under nasal endoscopy provides greater efficacy and safety for congenital dacryocystoceles.