Gamma Knife versus Frameless Linear Accelerator Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated with Local Failure and Radiation Necrosis

Abstract BackgroundSingle-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) for the treatment of brain metastases can be delivered with either a Gamma-Knife platform (GK-SRS) or with a frameless linear accelerator (LA-SRS) which vary based on patterns of prescribing, patient setup and radiation delivery. Whether these differences affect clinical outcomes is unknown. MethodsPatients treated for metastatic brain cancer treated with SF-SRS from 2014-2020 were retrospectively reviewed and clinical outcomes were recorded on a per lesion basis. Covariates between groups were compared using a Chi-square analysis for dichotomous variables and t-test for continuous variables. Median follow up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan Meier (KM) method. Primary endpoints of local failure (LF) and symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN) were estimated using the KM method with salvage WBRT used as a censoring event. Outcome estimates were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis (MVA) and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used for statistical analyses. Propensity score (PS) adjustments were used to reduce the effects confounding variables.ResultsOverall, 119 patients with 287 lesions were included for analysis which included 57 patients (127 lesions) treated with LA-SRS compared to 62 patients (160 lesions) treated with GK-SRS. On both multivariate and univariate analysis, there was no statistically significant differences between GK-SRS and LA-SRS for LF, RN, or the combined endpoint of either LF or RN (multivariate p-value=0.17).ConclusionsIn our retrospective cohort, we found no statistically significant differences in the incidence of RN or LF in patients treated with GK-SRS when compared to LA-SRS.Trial Registration: Retrospectively registered