Diagnostic Performance of CTA and vessel wall MR imaging in Carotid webs—A Retrospective Study

Hanpei Zheng,Huan Li,Sirui Li,Xiangbo Wu,Mei Bin, Yinghui Wang,Haibo Xu

semanticscholar(2019)

引用 0|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
Background: There currently is no consensus on the performance of Vessel wall MRI (VW MRI) with carotid webs (CaWs). No clear data exist on compare the performance of each diagnostic features in CaWs. Purpose: To set a standards about the diagnostic features and compare the performance of each diagnostic features in CaWs. Materials and methods : All patients (n = 165, median age, 56.9 ± 13.3) who has done both neck CTA and VW MRI in our radiology department, Zhongnan hospital, performed from February 2017 to April 2019 were included. All CTA and VW MRI images were read by two experienced radiologists. Interobserver agreement for the two reader’s decision of CTA was checked by using kappa statistics. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of each diagnostic features at CTA and VW MRI were compared. Results: 10 patients with carotid web was found. The feature “double lumen sign” of CTA and “valve sign” and “contrast stasis” of VW MRI showed good specificity (specificity, 98.6% vs 92.9% vs 93.6%, respectively; P<0.001). The feature “double lumen sign” of VW MRI compared to it of CTA showed higher sensitivity (sensitivity, 80.0% [8 of 10] vs 50.0% [5 of 10], respectively; P<0.001) and better diagnostic performances (area under the curve [AUC], 0.93 [95% CI: 0.68, 0.97] and 0.74 [95% CI: 0.54, 0.94], respectively; P<0.001). Conclusion: The feature “double lumen sign” and “a line or septum” of CTA and “valve sign” and “contrast stasis” of VW MRI may be a crucial performance of carotid web.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要