Improved Detection of Child Maltreatment with Routine Screening in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital.

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the impact of layering routine child abuse screening on top of a preexisting electronic health record-embedded Child Abuse Clinical Decision Support System (CA-CDSS) in a pediatric emergency department. STUDY DESIGN:The Pittsburgh Child Abuse Screening Tool (P-CAST) was performed in all children aged <13 years and in nonverbal children aged ≥13 years who presented to a pediatric tertiary care center over a 6-month period. The P-CAST was layered on top of a preexisting CA-CDSS that included passive triggers, alerts, and abuse-specific order sets. RESULTS:Of the 28 797 screens performed, 1.8% were positive in children aged <13 years and 1.6% were positive in nonverbal children aged ≥13 years. One-half of the children with a positive P-CAST also triggered the CA-CDSS; the other one-half triggered only because of the P-CAST. Nineteen percent of the patients with a positive P-CAST were reported to Child Protective Services (CPS). There was no relationship between race and the odds of a positive P-CAST or between race and the likelihood of a report being made to CPS. CONCLUSIONS:Active routine child abuse screening improves identification of suspected child maltreatment in a children's hospital above and beyond what is identified with a CA-CDSS, which depends on passive triggers. The lack of a relationship between race and a positive P-CAST or a report to CPS suggest that systematic child abuse screening may mitigate well-recognized racial disparities in identifying and reporting suspected child maltreatment.