Impact Investing

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS(2021)

Cited 463|Views123
No score
Abstract
We show that investors derive nonpecuniary utility from investing in dual-objective Venture Capital (VC) funds, thus sacrificing returns. Impact funds earn 4.7 percentage points (ppts) lower internal rates of return (IRRs) ex-post than traditional VC funds. In random utility/willingness-to-pay (WTP) models investors accept 2.5-3.7 ppts lower IRRs ex ante for impact funds. The positive WTP result is robust to fund access rationing and investor heterogeneity in fund expected returns. Development organizations, foundations, financial institutions, public pensions, Europeans, and United Nations Principles of Responsible Investment signatories have high WTP. Investors with mission objectives and/or facing political pressure exhibit high WTP; those subject to legal restrictions (e.g., Employee Retirement Income Security Act) exhibit low WTP. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
More
Translated text
Key words
Impact investing, Venture capital, Private equity, Socially responsible investment, United nations principles of responsible investment (UNPRI), Sustainable investing, Public pension funds, Willingness to pay, Random utility discrete choice models
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined