Comparison Of The Clinical Effects Of Small-Incision Resection And Botulinum Toxin Type A For Treating Underarm Odor

The objective of the study was to investigate the clinical differences between small-incision resection and botulinum toxin type A for treating underarm odor. In the study, patients were divided into the experimental group (62 cases) or control group (60 cases). The experimental group underwent small-incision resection to treat underarm odor, while the control group received botulinum toxin type A. The treatment effects for the two groups were compared after 6 months. The main indicators were the effective rate, complications, and recurrence rates. The study results showed that the differences in total effective rate and complication incidence were not statistically significant between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively. However, the difference in recurrence rate was statistically significant between the experimental group (4.84%) and the control group (90%) at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). In summary, small-incision resection sufficiently removed the odor, exhibiting a desirable effect and low recurrence rate. The axillary fossa maintained no obvious scar, and the incision did not affect the shape or function of the armpit. Thus, small-incision resection is a surgical method that should be promoted.