Failure Of An Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillator To Terminate Dc Shock Induced Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

A 62-year-old male patient with coronary artery disease and drug refractory sustained ventricular tachycardia received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (PRX III, model 1720, CPI) with a transvenous lead system (Endotak, model 0115, CPI) in combination with a subcutaneous array electrode (SQ array, model 049, CPI). The intraoperative defibrillation threshold was 15 J and was confirmed 1 week later at the hospital discharge test. Three months after discharge from hospital the patient reported 5 shocks during moderate physical exertion followed by a tachycardia associated with dizziness which terminated spontaneously. The print out of the stored electrogram showed a supraventricular tachycardia (probably sinus tachycardia) with a heart rate of 154/min which activated the device. Antitachycardia pacing did not terminate the supraventricular tachycardia, and hence shock therapy was delivered. The first shock (34 J) converted the supraventricular tachycardia to a ventricular tachycardia with a heart rate of 178/min, which was not terminated by four consecutive 34 J DC shocks, There was no hint of a device or lead failure. Determination of the defibrillation threshold reconfirmed the 15 J value for termination of ventricular fibrillation. However, neither a I J shock nor a 34 J shock terminated a monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia (cycle length 340 ms) induced by noninvasive programmed electrical stimulation. The ventricular tachycardia was, however, reproducibly terminated by antitachycardia pacing.It is concluded that an inappropriate high-energy DC shock might induce a sustained ventricular tachycardia. However, a sufficient defibrillation threshold for the termination of ventricular fibrillation does not necessarily mean that a sustained ventricular tachycardia will be terminated by a high-energy DC shock.