Proposal of a new classification: “sealed type” postinfarction left ventricular free wall rupture

Objective Postinfarction left ventricular free wall rupture (FWR) has been classified into blow-out type and oozing type. However, considering past papers, oozing type included the cases in which the bleeding had spontaneously stopped or sealed, and the distinction between blow-out type and oozing type was not always clear. We classified FWR into the BO type (combination of blow-out type and oozing type) with continuous bleeding and sealed type and clarified the pathophysiology of the sealed type. Methods Thirty-five patients who underwent surgical treatment for FWR during the past 21 years were retrospectively evaluated. Results Twenty-one patients (60%) were sealed. Comparing the sealed type with the BO type, the incidence of sudden collapse with acute onset was significantly lower (sealed type; 62%, BO type; 100%, P = 0.0118), and there were more cases of transport from outside the hospital (76%, 43%, P = 0.0453). Significantly few cases had electro-mechanical dissociation immediately before surgery (10%, 71%, P = 0.0001). In the sealed type, median sternotomy was performed in 9 patients (43%), and subxiphoid drainage was performed in 12 (57%). Fifteen patients (71%) were supported by IABP postoperatively, and re-rupture occurred in 3 patients without IABP. Long-term outcomes were significantly better in the sealed type than in the BO type. Conclusion Sixty percent of postinfarction ventricular free wall rupture was the sealed type. Median sternotomy and sutureless repair with postoperative IABP support were reliable treatments. Subxiphoid drainage and strict blood pressure control with IABP may be acceptable surgical strategies in elderly, frail patients.