Performance Of Sepsis-3 Definitions In A Middle Income Country Intensive Care Unit

Background: Since they were first published in 2016, Sepsis-3 definitions have not been universally accepted. Rather, they have become a source of controversy because the clinical and laboratory parameters used had been derived mainly from patients hospitalized in Intensive Care Units (ICU) in the United States.Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Sepsis-3 definitions for the prediction of ICU-mortality in a Tunisian ICU population as compared to the 2003 Consensus Definitions (Sepsis-2 definitions)Method: The study, conducted in an 18-bed medical-surgical ICU at the Military Hospital of Tunis (Tunisia), was retrospective in nature. From January 2012 to January 2016, all patients admitted to the ICU for sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock as defined according to the 2003 Consensus Definitions (Sepsis-2 consensus) were eligible for this study. The new Sepsis-3 definition was then used to classify the included patients. The primary area of interest was ICU mortality, defined as death before ICU dischargeResults: A total of 1080 patients were included during the recruitment period. When Sepsis-2 definitions were used, there was a difference in mortality only between septic shock and sepsis patients. Sepsis-3 definitions show that mortality increased from 16 % among no-dysfunction-infected patients to 30 % among patients with qSOFA >= 2 and 44% and 46% for sepsis or septic shock patients, respectively.Conclusions: Sepsis-3 definitions were better than sepsis-2 definitions at stratifying mortality among septic patients admitted to an ICU of a middle-income country (Tunisia).