Association between electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems with initiation of tobacco use in individuals aged < 20 years. A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLOS ONE(2021)

Cited 23|Views17
No score
Abstract
Background This systematic review described the association between electronic nicotine delivery systems and electronic non-nicotine delivery systems (ENDS/ENNDS) use among non-smoking children and adolescents aged <20 years with subsequent tobacco use. Methods We searched five electronic databases and the grey literature up to end of September 2020. Prospective longitudinal studies that described the association between ENDS/ENNDS use, and subsequent tobacco use in those aged < 20 years who were non-smokers at baseline were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess risk of bias. Data were extracted by two reviewers and pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. We generated unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (ARRs) describing associations between ENDS/ENNDS and tobacco use. Findings A total of 36 publications met the eligibility criteria, of which 25 were included in the systematic review (23 in the meta-analysis) after exclusion of overlapping studies. Sixteen studies had high to moderate risk of bias. Ever users of ENDS/ENNDS had over three times the risk of ever cigarette use (ARR 3.01 (95% CI: 2.37, 3.82; p<0.001, I-2: 82.3%), and current cigarette use had over two times the risk (ARR 2.56 (95% CI: 1.61, 4.07; p<0.001, I-2: 77.3%) at follow up. Among current ENDS/ENNDS users, there was a significant association with ever (ARR 2.63 (95% CI: 1.94, 3.57; p<0.001, I-2: 21.2%)), but not current cigarette use (ARR 1.88 (95% CI: 0.34, 10.30; p = 0.47, I-2: 0%)) at follow up. For other tobacco use, ARR ranged between 1.55 (95% CI 1.07, 2.23) and 8.32 (95% CI: 1.20, 57.04) for waterpipe and pipes, respectively. Additionally, two studies examined the use of ENNDS (non-nicotine devices) and found a pooled adjusted RR of 2.56 (95% CI: 0.47, 13.94, p = 0.035). Conclusion There is an urgent need for policies that regulate the availability, accessibility, and marketing of ENDS/ENNDS to children and adolescents. Governments should also consider adopting policies to prevent ENDS/ENNDS uptake and use in children and adolescents, up to and including a ban for this group.
More
Translated text
Key words
electronic nicotine delivery systems,tobacco use,systematic review,individuals aged,non-nicotine,meta-analysis
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined