Safety and technical efficacy of pre-operative embolization of head and neck paragangliomas: A 10-year mono-centric experience and systematic review

Clinical Imaging(2021)

引用 14|浏览61
暂无评分
摘要
Objectives To retrospectively evaluate the safety and technical success of pre-operative embolization (POE) of head and neck paragangliomas (HNP) in a single-center cohort over a 10-year period, and to benchmark our results with those derived from a systematic analysis of the available literature. Methods All consecutive HNP embolized between November 2010 and April 2020 were included and reviewed. In total, there were 27 HNP in 27 patients [8 (30%) males; 19 (70%) females; mean age 53 ± 16 years; range 30–86].Embolization technique, total procedure time, dose area product (DAP), complications, rate of HNP devascularization, and technical success (i.e. ≥80% devascularization of the HNP) were recorded and analyzed.A systematic analysis on the safety and technical success of POE was then conducted according to the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results Twenty-one (21/27; 78%) HNP were treated with an endovascular approach and 6/27 (22%) with a percutaneous or combined (endovascular/percutaneous) technique. Mean total procedure time and DAP were 108 ± 48 min (range 45–235) and 92.5 ± 61.3 Gy·cm2 (range 19.9–276.0), respectively. Two (2/27; 7%) complications (one minor, one major) were observed.Mean HNP devascularization was 88 ± 15% (range 23–100) with technical success achieved in 24/27 (89%) HNP.Literature analysis revealed a pooled rate of complication and technical success of 3.8% (95% CI: 0.5–8.8%) and 79.0% (95% CI: 63.6–91.6%), respectively. Conclusions POE of HNP is safe and results in extensive devascularization in the majority of treated tumors.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Paraganglioma,Carotid body tumor,Embolization,Outcome
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要