New thin-film adhesive for sealing full-thickness corneal incisions in rabbits.

PURPOSE:To compare the repair of penetrating corneal incisions in an in vivo rabbit model using a laser-activated thin-film adhesive, sutures, or self-seal. SETTING:The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia. DESIGN:Animal studies. METHODS:Under an operating microscope, 2.0 mm penetrating incisions were created in 162 right eyes. Incisions in one group were repaired with the adhesive, the second group received a single 10-0 nylon suture, and the third group was left to self-seal. Rabbits were killed humanely at predetermined timepoints over 2 weeks, and wound healing was assessed using burst pressure and immunohistological studies. A modified McDonald-Shadduck scoring was used to assess eyes. RESULTS:The mean burst pressure of the adhesive group was significantly higher than the sutured or self-sealed groups at all timepoints within the first 72 hours. At 0 hour, the burst pressure was 98.0 (±17.0) mm Hg, 30.6 (±2.1) mm Hg, and 3.8 (±0.6) mm Hg (P < .00001) for adhesive-treated (n = 5), sutured (n = 5), and self-sealed wounds (n = 5), respectively. These increased to 229.0 (±53.7) mm Hg, 12.4 (±2.9) mm Hg, and 27.3 (±4.0) mm Hg (P = .0011) at 72 hours. The modified McDonald-Shadduck score was significantly higher for eyes repaired using the adhesive than those sutured or left to self-seal for the first 72 hours. On histology and immunofluorescence, adhesive treatment demonstrated better wound approximation and higher myofibroblastic activation than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS:The adhesive was efficacious in sealing penetrating corneal incisions and tolerated higher burst pressures than sutures or self-seal. The adhesive was biocompatible in rabbits, and incisions demonstrated a rapid gain in wound strength that sustained over the study period.