Evaluation Of Interference From Hemoglobin C, D, E And S Traits On Measurements Of Hemoglobin A1c By Fifteen Methods

Curt Rohlfing,Steven Hanson, Mathew P Estey, Pierre Bordeleau,Randie R Little

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA(2021)

引用 15|浏览2
暂无评分
摘要
Background: Hemoglobin C, D Punjab, E or S trait can interfere with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) results. We assessed whether they affect results obtained with 15 current assay methods. Methods: Hemoglobin AA (HbAA), HbAC, HbAD Punjab, HbAE and HbAS samples were analyzed on 2 enzymatic, 4 ion-exchange HPLC and 9 immunoassay methods. Trinity Premier Hb9210 boronate affinity HPLC was the comparative method. An overall test of coincidence of least-squared linear regression lines was performed to determine if HbA1c results were statistically significantly different from those of HbAA samples. Clinically significant interference was defined as >6% difference from HbAA at 6 or 9% HbA1c compared to Premier Hb9210 using Deming regression. Results: All methods showed statistically significant effects for one or more variants. Clinically significant effects were observed for the Tosoh G11 variant mode (HbAD), Roche b 101 (HbAC and HbAE) and Siemens DCA Vantage (HbAE and HbAS). All other methods (Beckman Coulter B93009 and B00389 on DxC700AU, and Unicel DxC, Ortho Clinical Vitros 5.1, Roche cobas c 513, Siemens Dimension RxL and Vista, and Enzymatic on Advia and Atellica, Tosoh G8 5.24 and 5.28, and GX) showed no clinically significant differences. Conclusions: A few methods showed interference from one or more variants. Laboratories need to be aware of potential HbA1c assay interferences.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Hemoglobin A1c, Hemoglobin Variants, Diabetes, HPLC, Capillary Electrophoresis, Immunoassay, Enzymatic
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要