Defining global benchmarks in elective secondary bariatric surgery comprising conversional, revisional and reversal procedures

D. Gero, M. Vannijvel, S. Okkema, E. Deleus, A. Lloyd, E. Lo Menzo, G. Tadros, I. Raguz, A. San Martin, M. Kraljevic, S. Mantziari, S. Frey, L. Gensthaler, H. Sammalkorpi, J. L. Garcia-Galocha, A. Zapata, T. Tatarian, T. Wiggins, E. Bardisi, J. -P. Goreux, R. Vonlanthen, J. Widmer, A. Thalheimer, J. Himpens, M. Hollymann, R. Welbourn, R. Aggarwal, A. Beekley, M. Sepulveda, A. Torres, A. Juuti, P. Salminen, G. Prager, A. Iannelli, M. Suter, R. Peterli, C. Boza, R. Rosenthal, K. Higa, M. Lannoo, E. J. Hazebroek, B. Dillemans, P. -A. Clavien, M. Puhan, D. A. Raptis, M. Bueter

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY（2021）

引用 27|浏览28

暂无评分

摘要

Secondary BS is safe, although postoperative morbidity exceeds the established benchmarks for primary BS. The excess morbidity is due to an increased risk of gastrointestinal leakage and higher need for intensive care. The considerable rate of tertiary BS warrants expertise and future research to optimize the management of non-success after BS.

查看译文

关键词

benchmarks, complication, conversion, morbidity, quality, reoperation, reversal, revision, secondary bariatric surgery, surgical outcomes

AI 理解论文

溯源树

样例

生成溯源树，研究论文发展脉络

Chat Paper

正在生成论文摘要