SARS-CoV-2-specific circulating T follicular helper cells correlate with neutralizing antibodies and increase during early convalescence

Author summary Since December 2019, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Recently approved vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are understood to protect against infection by inducing neutralizing antibodies. However, the underlying immune responses necessary for protection remain unclear. It is well established that T follicular helper cells (Tfh), a subset of CD4 T cells, are essential to the development of neutralizing antibodies and that some of these cells, called circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh), can be studied in the blood. Not much is known about Tfh responses mounted in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here, we studied cTfh responses to three major structural proteins in individuals recovered from COVID-19. We find that SARS-CoV-2-specific cTfh frequencies correlate with neutralizing antibody responses. We also find that cTfh responses to SARS-CoV2 increase well into convalescence before contracting. Our results suggest that cTfh responses against proteins other than the spike protein may contribute to the development of neutralizing antibodies and that the formation of cTfh responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection may be delayed. T-cell immunity is likely to play a role in protection against SARS-CoV-2 by helping generate neutralizing antibodies. We longitudinally studied CD4 T-cell responses to the M, N, and S structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2 in 26 convalescent individuals. Within the first two months following symptom onset, a majority of individuals (81%) mounted at least one CD4 T-cell response, and 48% of individuals mounted detectable SARS-CoV-2-specific circulating T follicular helper cells (cTfh, defined as CXCR5(+)PD1(+) CD4 T cells). SARS-CoV-2-specific cTfh responses across all three protein specificities correlated with antibody neutralization with the strongest correlation observed for S protein-specific responses. When examined over time, cTfh responses, particularly to the M protein, increased in convalescence, and robust cTfh responses with magnitudes greater than 5% were detected at the second convalescent visit, a median of 38 days post-symptom onset. CD4 T-cell responses declined but persisted at low magnitudes three months and six months after symptom onset. These data deepen our understanding of antigen-specific cTfh responses in SARS-CoV-2 infection, suggesting that in addition to S protein, M and N protein-specific cTfh may also assist in the development of neutralizing antibodies and that cTfh response formation may be delayed in SARS-CoV-2 infection.