Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal insufficiency

Objective To assess the effect and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with renal insufficiency. Patients and methods A prospective randomized clinical study of 104 renal insufficiency patients with renal stones (serum creatinine 2–4 mg/dl and eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 more than 3 months) randomized into two groups: Group A underwent PNL; Group B underwent shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Treatment effects and outcomes compared between the two groups. Results Between Group A of 50 patients and Group B of 54 cases, demographic data showed no statistically significant differences. The stone-free rate was 84% in Group A versus 26.6% in Group B after the first SWL session. After completion of all SWL sessions, the rate was 88.9% for Group B. Comparing pre and postoperative results of Group A, there is significant improvement of serum creatinine concentrations by 9.1% ( p = 0.001), significant improvement of creatinine clearance ( p = 0.000) and eGFR ( p = 0.003). Although regarding Group B preoperatively and 3 months after SWL there is significant improvement by 8.7% ( p = 0.0001), which is less than that of Group A, there is also, improvement of eGFR by 6.7% ( p = 0.001), which is less than the eGFR improvement in Group A (12.3%). But there is no statistically significant difference is noted for creatinine clearance in Group B ( p = 0.09). Conclusion The outcomes for PNL and SWL in patients with renal insufficiency and renal stones are encouraging as minimally invasive procedures with no negative effects on kidney function.