Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background Numerous studies have concentrated on neoadjuvant therapies for treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) that improve the pathological complete response (pCR) rate but remain controversial. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to objectively explore the efficacy and safety of different neoadjuvant regimens. Methods Phase II/III randomized clinical trials that compared different neoadjuvant therapies for TNBC were included. NMA and pairwise meta-analysis were performed using WinBUGS (version 1.4.3) and Review Manager 5.3. Results Forty-four studies with 8459 patients met the eligibility criteria. The NMA of pCR showed that programmed cell death Protein-1 and programmed cell death Ligand-1 inhibitors (PD-1/PD-L1), bevacizumab (Bev), zoledronic acid (ZOL), and platinum salts plus poly polymerase inhibitors (Pt+PARPi) may be favorable for TNBC neoadjuvant therapy. Chemotherapy combined with platinum salts or nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Nab-p) has additional beneficial effects. However, neo-type drugs may also have increased toxicity. Conclusion PD-1/PD-L1, Bev, ZOL, and Pt+ PARPi-containing regimens improved the pCR rate compared to traditional chemotherapy, including anthracyclines and taxanes. Chemotherapy with platinum salts or Nab-p improved the pCR rate. Nevertheless, the balance between efficacy and toxicity should be evaluated rigorously. PD-1/PD-L1-containing regimens appear to be the most favorable for TNBC neoadjuvant therapy, with good efficacy and tolerance.