Laryngeal Function In Normal Dogs Administered Isoflurane Following Partial Clearance Of Alfaxalone Or Propofol

Objective To assess laryngeal function in normal dogs administered isoflurane following partial clearance of alfaxalone or propofol.Study design Randomized experimental crossover study.Animals A group of 12 purpose-bred, male Beagle dogs.Methods Dogs were randomly assigned to one of two treatments: alfaxaloneeisoflurane (ALF-ISO) or propofoleisoflurane (PRO-ISO) and anesthetized for three video laryngoscopy examinations. The alternate treatment occurred after >= 14 days interval. Examinations were performed after induction of anesthesia (LS-A), after 20 minutes of breathing isoflurane via a facemask (LS-B) and after a further 20 minutes of isoflurane (LS-C). Parameters of objective laryngeal function included inspiratory rima glottidis surface area (RGSA-I), expiratory rima glottidis surface area (RGSA-E) and % RGSA increase, calculated from three consecutive respiratory cycles in the final 15 seconds of each video laryngoscopy examination. The % RGSA increase was calculated using [(RGSA-I - RGSA-E)/RGSA-E] x 100. Subjective laryngeal function was evaluated independently by two experienced surgeons blinded to treatment.Results The % RGSA increase within each treatment was greater for LS-B and LS-C than for LS-A (ALF-ISO: p = 0.03, PRO-ISO: p = < 0.001). There was no difference within each treatment from LS-B compared with LS-C. RGSA-I increased within each treatment from LS-A to both LS-B and LS-C (ALF-ISO: p = 0.002) and to LS-C (PRO-ISO: p = 0.006). Subjective laryngeal function scores improved from LS-A to LS-C.Conclusions and clinical relevance Laryngeal function improved from postinduction examination following either 20 or 40 minutes of anesthesia with isoflurane via facemask. This study demonstrates that isoflurane may have a lesser effect on arytenoid abduction activity compared with more commonly used intravenous induction anesthetics (alfaxalone and propofol).