Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Differential Induction of Allergen-Specific IgA Responses Following Timothy Grass Subcutaneous and Sublingual Immunotherapy.

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology(2021)

Cited 35|Views31
No score
Abstract
Introduction: There is no detailed comparison of allergen-specific immunoglobulin responses following sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Objective: We sought to compare nasal and systemic timothy grass pollen (TGP)-specific antibody responses during 2 years of SCIT and SLIT and 1 year after treatment discontinuation in a double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial. Methods: Nasal fluid and serum were obtained yearly (perprotocol population, n = 84). TGP-specific IgA(1), IgA(2), IgG(4), IgG, and IgE were measured in nasal fluids by ELISA. TGPspecific IgA(1), IgA(2), and Phleum pratense (Phl p)1, 2, 4, 5b, 6, 7, 11, and 12 IgE and IgG(4) were measured in sera by ELISA and ImmunoCAP, respectively. Results: At years 2 and 3, TGP-IgA(1/2) levels in nasal fluid were elevated in SLIT compared with SCIT (4.2- and 3.0-fold for IgA(1), 2.0- and 1.8-fold for IgA(2), respectively; all P<.01). TGP-IgA(1) level in serum was elevated in SLIT compared with SCIT at years 1, 2, and 3 (4.6-, 5.1-, and 4.7-fold, respectively; all P<.001). Serum TGP-IgG level was higher in SCIT compared with SLIT (2.8-fold) at year 2. Serum TGP-IgG(4) level was higher in SCIT compared with SLIT at years 1, 2, and 3 (10.4-, 27.4-, and 5.1-fold, respectively; all P<.01). Serum IgG(4) levels to Phl p1, 2, 5b, and 6 were increased at years 1, 2, and 3 in SCIT and SLIT compared with placebo (Phl p1: 11.8- and 3.9-fold; Phl p2: 31.6- and 4.4-fold; Phl p5b: 135.5- and 5.3-fold; Phl p6: 145.4- and 14.7-fold, respectively, all at year 2 when levels peaked; P<.05). IgE to TGP in nasal fluid increased in the SLIT group at year 2 but not at year 3 compared with SCIT (2.8-fold; P = .04) and placebo (3.1-fold; P = .02). IgA to TGP and IgE and IgG(4) to TGP components stratified participants according to treatment group and clinical response. Conclusions: The observed induction of IgA(1/2) in SLIT and IgG(4) in SCIT suggest key differences in the mechanisms of action.
More
Translated text
Key words
Sublingual immunotherapy,subcutaneous immuno-therapy,IgE-FAB,blocking antibodies,IgG(4),IgA(1),IgA(2),allergic rhinitis
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined