Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

Does the Assessment of Different Combinations of Within-Phase Subjective Measures Influence Electrodermal Responding and Between-Phase Subjective Ratings During Fear Conditioning and Extinction Experiments?

Biological Psychology(2021)

Cited 6|Views2
No score
Abstract
The type and number of dependent measures assessed have varied between fear conditioning and extinction experiments and it remains unclear whether methodological differences influence results. Measuring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and between-phase subjective ratings between four conditions; Con condition had no within-phase ratings; US Exp condition included within-phase US expectancy ratings only; CS Eval condition included within-phase CS evaluations only and All Meas condition included both. All Meas condition exhibited larger SCRs compared to other conditions during acquisition, extinction, and return of differential responding at test. Differential SCRs did not extinguish in CS Eval and Con conditions, and CS Eval condition exhibited smaller CS- SCRs than other conditions throughout phases. US Exp condition revealed differential conditioning, successful extinction, and no return of differential SCRs. Between-phase ratings were not affected by within-phase ratings. Researchers should consider assessing different combinations of within-phase subjective ratings depending on the aims of their research.
More
Translated text
Key words
Fear conditioning,Fear extinction,Electrodermal responding,Skin conductance responses,Dependent measures,CS evaluations,Subjective anxiety ratings,US expectancy ratings
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined