Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

体外冲击波联合腕踝针治疗肱二头肌长头肌腱炎的临床研究

The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology(2019)

Cited 0|Views10
No score
Abstract
目的:观察体外冲击波联合腕踝针治疗肱二头肌长头肌腱炎的临床疗效.方法:将80例肱二头肌长头肌腱炎患者随机分为2组,每组40例.联合组采用体外冲击波联合腕踝针治疗,封闭组采用局部封闭治疗.体外冲击波治疗每周1次,连续治疗3次;腕踝针治疗隔天1次,连续治疗3周;局部封闭治疗每周1次,共治疗3次.分别于治疗前和治疗结束后比较患者的肩部疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、Constant-Murley肩关节评分,并于治疗结束后按照自拟标准评价总体疗效.结果:联合组1例患者因未能坚持完成治疗而被剔除.治疗前2组患者的肩关节疼痛VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.535,P=0.594);治疗结束后2组患者的VAS评分均较治疗前降低[联合组:(7.10±1.05)分,(2.64±1.18)分,t=17.377,P=0.000;封闭组:(6.98±1.07)分,(3.23±0.89)分,t=19.533,P=0.000],联合组的VAS评分低于封闭组(t=-2.485,P=0.015).治疗前2组患者的Constant-Murley评分比较,差异无统计学意义(t=-1.367,P=0.176);治疗结束后2组患者的Constant-Murley评分均较治疗前升高[联合组:(29.41±6.15)分,(77.10±7.41)分,t=-33.733,P=0.000;封闭组:(31.38±6.60)分,(70.95±6.07)分,t=-30.574,P=0.000],联合组的Constant-Murley评分高于封闭组(t=4.041,P=0.000).联合组的总体疗效优于封闭组(R-联合组=35.03,R-封闭组=44.85,Z=-2.036,P=0.042).结论:体外冲击波联合腕踝针可以有效减轻肱二头肌长头肌腱炎患者的疼痛,改善肩关节功能,总体疗效优于局部封闭治疗.
More
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined