机械血栓切除术后"成功"再通的前循环卒中患者的转归:TICI 3与TICI 2b比较

International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases(2017)

Cited 0|Views5
No score
Abstract
目的 探讨急性前循环卒中机械取栓后脑梗死溶栓(Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction, TICI)再通分级TICI 2b与TICI 3患者的转归差异.方法 回顾性纳入机械血栓切除术后"成功"再通的急性前循环卒中患者,并分为TICI 2b(几乎完全再通)组和TICI 3(完全再通)组.转归良好定义为发病后3个月时改良Rankin量表评分0~2分.结果 共纳入83例患者.TICI 2b级38例(45.8%),TICI 3级45例(54.2%);49例(59.0%)转归良好,34例(40.9%)转归不良.TICI 3组转归良好率显著高于TICI 2b组(68.9%对47.4%;χ2=3.946,P=0.047).多变量logistic回归分析显示,校正年龄、高血压、糖尿病、基线收缩压、三酰甘油、静脉溶栓、ASITN/SIR侧支循环分级后,TICI 3级是发病后3个月时转归良好的独立预测因素[优势比(odds ratio, OR)3.759,95%可信区间(confidence interval, CI)1.098~12.871;P=0.035],而基线NIHSS评分较高(OR 0.820,95% CI 0.715~0.941;P=0.005)和空腹血糖较高(OR 0.610,95% CI 0.410~0.906;P=0.014)是发病后3个月时转归不良的独立预测因素.结论 机械血栓切除术后"成功"再通的急性前循环缺血性卒中患者转归存在差异,TICI 3的患者显著优于TICI 2b的患者.
More
Translated text
Key words
Modified Rankin Scale,Stroke,Thrombolysis,Cerebral infarction,Odds ratio,Confidence interval,Cardiology,Ischemia,Diabetes mellitus,Medicine,Internal medicine
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined