Percutaneous mesh-container-plasty for osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures: A prospective, nonrandomized comparative study
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA(2021)
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results of percutaneous mesh-container-plasty (PMCP) versus percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of osteopomtic thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods: A prospective study of 122 patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures was conducted. The patients were non-randomly assigned to receive PKP (62; 16 men, 46 women) and PMCP (60; 14 men, 46 women). The epidemiological data, surgical outcomes, and clinical and radiological features were compared between the 2 groups. Cement leakage, height restoration, deformity correction. canal compromise, and cement distribution were calculated from the radiographs. Visual pain analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability index (ODD, and short-form 36 health survey domains role physical (SF-36 rp) and bodily pain (SF-36 bp) were calculated before surgery and immediately and 2 years after surgery. Results: Although VAS, ODI, SF-36 bp, and SF-36 rp scores improved from 7 (6-9), 71.28 +/- 16.38, 22 (0-32), and 25 (0-50) preoperatively to 2 (1-3), 20.02 +/- 8.97, 84 (84-84), and 75 (75-100) immediately postoperatively in the PMCP group (p<0.05) and from 7 (6-8), 71.40 +/- 13.52, 22 (10.5-31.75), and 25 (0-50) preoperatively to 2 (1-3), 21.78 +/- 11.21, 89 (89-84), and 75 (75-100) immediately postoperatively in the PKP group (1),(105), there was no difference between the 2 groups. The mean cost in the PKP group was less than that in the PMCP group ($5109 +/- 231 vs. $6699 +/- 201, p<0.05). Anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral body height ratios in the PMCP group were greater than those in the PKP group postoperatively (88.44%+/- 3.76% vs. 81.10%+/- 11.78%, 86.15%+/- 3.50% vs. 82.30%+/- 11.02%, and 93.91%+/- 3.01% vs. 91.43%+/- 6.71%. respectively. p<0.05). The Cobb angle in the PMCP group was lower than that in the PKP group postoperatively (6.67 degrees +/- 4.39 degrees vs. 8.99 degrees 1-4.06 degrees. p<0.05). Cement distribution in the PMCP group was higher than that in the PKP group (30.48%+/- 5.62% vs. 27.18%+/- 4.87%, p<0.05). Cement leakage was observed to be lesser in the PMCP group (2/60) than Si the PKP group (10 vs. 62, p<0.05). Conclusion: Both PKP and PMCP treatments seem to have significant ability Si pain relief and functional recovery. Despite its higher cost, PMCP treatment may have a better inhibition ability of cement leakage, cement distribution, height restoration, and improvement in segmental kyphosis than PKP treatment for osteopomtic thoracolumbar burst fractures.
更多查看译文
关键词
Spinal fracture,Minimally invasive surgery,Osteoporosis,Percutaneous kyphoplasty,Mesh container
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
![](https://originalfileserver.aminer.cn/sys/aminer/pubs/mrt_preview.jpeg)
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要