809. Modified Laboratory Reporting to Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs)

Abstract Background Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are among the most common healthcare-associated infections. Many patients at our institution with a CAUTI do not have signs or symptoms of infection and bacterial growth likely represents asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). As a result, we implemented a Modified Lab Workflow (MLW) focused on diagnostic stewardship to improve urine culture (UCx) reporting and prevent misclassification and unnecessary treatment of CAUTIs. Methods On Sep. 1, 2019, laboratory reporting of Foley UCx was modified according to the protocol in Figure 1. UCx results were divided into 3 groups: (1) no growth, (2) mixed bacterial flora (≥3 organisms) not consistent with infection or (3) growth of ≤2 organisms with at least 1 organism ≥105 cfu/ml per National Healthcare Safety Network (NSHN) CAUTI definition. Group 3 UCx were resulted with instructions to the clinician (see Figure 1.). When requested, group 3 results were reviewed by Infection Prevention and released with organism identification and antibiotic susceptibility if it met Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) CAUTI criteria. Otherwise they were resulted as: “Bacterial growth indicative of contamination or colonization.” Figure 1. Modified Laboratory Workflow for Reporting Urine Cultures from Foley Catheters Results Between Sep. 1, 2019 to Mar. 1, 2020, a total of 134 UCx from catheterized patients were reviewed. Forty-two (31%) of UCx were from patients with a Foley in-situ ≥48 hours and processed through MLW; 92 UCx were from a Foley in place < 48 hours and excluded from the study. Of the 42 UCx processed via MLW, 16 (38%) were no growth and 7 (17%) had bacterial growth suggestive of contamination. For group 3, 19/42 (45%) had growth of significant bacteria but only 1(5%) met IDSA criteria for reporting. During the study, 6 additional CAUTIs were reported due to incorrect specimen labeling causing Foley urine specimens to subvert MLW. Conclusion During our study, we identified 1 CAUTI through apt MLW use. Seven total CAUTIs occurred (SIR=0.66); a majority due to incorrect UCx source labeling, resulting in missed MLW screening. Ten CAUTIs (SIR=0.97) were reported in the preceding 6 months. As part of a comprehensive CAUTI prevention program, a MLW can help reduce classification of ASB as a CAUTI. Education to providers on precise labeling of UCx source is a key component of a successful MLW. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures