Evaluation of A2 and A4 Hand Pulley Repair Using Tendon Graft Rings

Purpose To compare the mechanical characteristics of A2 and combined A2-A4 pulley repair in the intact and damaged flexor pulley system.Methods After control testing, we recorded tendon excursion and flexion of 11 cadaveric fingers after several interventions: (1) complete excision of A2 and A4, (2) repair of the A2 with one ring of tendon graft, (3) repair of the A2 with 2 rings of tendon graft, and (4) repair of the A2 with 2 rings combined with repair the A4 with one ring.Results At the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, the maximum rotational angle decreased by an average of 30% after complete excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys. This angle was still decreased compared with the control by an average of 25% after one-ring repair at A2, 23% after 2-ring repair at A2, and 17% after 2-ring repair at A2 combined with one-ring repair at A4. At the metacarpophalangeal joint, the average maximum rotational angle decreased by an average of 17% after complete excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys. This angle was still decreased compared with the control by an average of 11% after one-ring repair at A2, 7% after 2-ring repair at A2, and 4% after 2-ring repair at A2 combined with one-ring repair at A4. Kinematic behavior at the PIP joint with an intact pulley system was most closely approximated by the 3-loop repair. The least similar behavior was with a 2-ring construct at A2.Conclusions All repairs increased average flexion at the PIP and metacarpophalangeal joints compared with the unrepaired samples. The 3-ring configuration exhibited a higher recovery of PIP flexion compared with the other repairs. (Copyright (C) 2021 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)