Setting Up a New Microsurgical Breast Service in a Non-Tertiary Hospital: is It Safe, and Do Outcomes Compare to Centres of Excellence?

Aims: Access to autologous reconstruction continues to be limited in some areas of the United Kingdom. This is, in part, due to the perceived difficulty offering this service outside of a large tertiary centre. We present our experience setting up a new microsurgical breast reconstruction service in a district hospital and compare our results to the published outcomes of large volume centres. Methods: Patient data were collected prospectively from the start of the service to date (July 2018-July 2020) with the capture of demographics, management, and outcomes. The BREAST-Q tool was used preoperatively and at a minimum of 3 months. Results: The first 40 patients undergoing DIEP reconstruction were included. Of these, 70% were immediate, mean age was 49 years (27-68) and BMI was 28.1 kg/m2 (22-32.5). In all, 50% had one or more co-morbidities other than breast cancer. Median length of stay was 3 days (2-6) with 75% of patients discharged on day 2 or 3. Ten patients' stay exceeded 3 days - mostly due to social reasons. Flap loss occurred in 1 patient (2.5%). Twenty-one patients developed complications (52%) within 90 days: seven Clavien-Dindo Grade I, two Grade II and ten Grade IIIb. Fat necrosis and mastectomy flap necrosis were the most common complications. Surgical intervention was higher in those needing adjuvant therapy. Patient-reported outcomes showed post-operative improvement across all domains except abdominal physical well-being at median 11.3 months. Conclusions: We present the shortest published length of stay for unilateral DIEP reconstructions. We are the first paper to publish patient-reported outcomes following a breast microsurgical enhanced recovery protocol. We demonstrate how a new microsurgical service, utilising an enhanced recovery protocol and careful patient selection can immediately achieve outcomes comparable to well-established centres. There is no reason why all patients should not have access to microsurgical breast reconstruction locally. (c) 2021 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.