Comparison of Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Women Affected by Placenta Previa With and Without a History of Cesarean Delivery: A Cohort Study

Objective Comprehensive comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between placenta previa with and without a history of caesarean delivery is sparse in the literature. The objective of this study was to conduct such an analysis. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving all cases of placenta previa among 56 070 singleton births at two tertiary care hospitals in Guangdong, China, between January 2014 and December 2018. Placenta previa cases were divided into two groups: those with a history of caesarean delivery and those without. We first compared baseline characteristics and then compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. Multiple log binomial regression and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to estimate independent association between a history of caesarean delivery and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Results A total of 773 placenta previa cases were included in the final analysis. Of them, 546 had a history of cesarean delivery and 227 did not. Compared with placenta previa cases without a history of cesarean delivery, placenta previa cases with a history of caesarean delivery were at increased risks of placenta accrete and increta, uterine rapture, shock, severe anemia, hysterectomy, and increased bleeding and hospital costs. No differences in neonatal outcomes between the two groups were observed. Conclusions History of caesarean delivery is associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes but not with neonatal outcomes with placenta previa.