Bottom-up and top-down uncertainty quantification for measurements

T. Burr, S. Croft,A. Favalli, T. Krieger,B. Weaver

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems(2021)

Cited 11|Views10
No score
Abstract
Several recent papers address improved uncertainty quantification (UQ) for measurements used in nuclear safeguards. This paper reviews progress and presents new results for bottom-up (first principles) and top-down (empirical) UQ for safeguards, where the main quantitative measure of uncertainty is the total measurement error standard deviation (SD), which includes both random and systematic error components. The five main UQ topics addressed here include: (1) impact of making data-driven choices in SD estimation; (2) use of approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) for both bottom-up and top-down UQ; (3) computational calibration; (4) revisions to the guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM), and (5) critique of a recently-suggested “Unified Theory of Measurement Errors and Uncertainties.”
More
Translated text
Key words
Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC),Bottom-up and top-down UQ (UQ),Data-driven choices,Guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement,Item-specific bias,t-distribution
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined